EXCISE assessees can start filing on-line returns
from June 30. The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has
extended the facility of e-filing of returns - ER-1, ER-2 and ER-3 -
to manufacturers of excisable goods, EOUs and registered dealers on
a monthly and quarterly basis. Assessees and registered dealers who
have been allotted 15 digit Excise Control Code are entitled to
avail this facility. Both monthly returns of June' 04 and quarterly
return of April-June' 04 can be filed on-line.
The facility of e-filing is optional for the
present as it is likely to take sometime for all assesses to file
returns electronically. Assesses maintaining computerised data would
find filing simpler, as a software would be provided to structure
and transmit the data.
[Source : The Economic Times]
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2004
01:50:28 AM
NEW DELHI
: The
government will soon come up with detailed guidelines for private banks
including hike in the foreign holding from 49 to 74% and allowing foreign
banks to set up subsidiaries in the country.
“We have given the papers to department of
industrial policy and promotion. It (notification) may come tomorrow,”
secretary for financial sector, NS Sisodia, said. The guidelines are being
awaited by a host of private banks like Centurion Bank, Global Trust Bank, IDBI
Bank, who want to increase their capital base and carry out expansions. Foreign
banks like HSBC, ABN Amro Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and
Nova Scotia
are also eyeing subsidiaries
in
India
following the
relaxation of the FDI norms.
Although the Cabinet had approved the
proposal for hiking FDI ceiling in private banks on January 15, the finance
ministry and the Reserve Bank were fine-tuning the guidelines.
The FDI hike in banking sector was first
suggested by the NK Singh panel but the finance ministry and RBI had added a
slew of stringent conditionalities to prevent ownership of banks going into
wrong hands. Sources in the ministry said the guidelines would allow FDI
ceiling to go up to 74% from the present 49% but the investors mandatorily need
to get a credit rating and RBI’s nod. The overall 74% foreign holding would
include foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign institutional investments
(FII), NRIs, initial public offers, private placements and ADRs/GDRs.
The FDI ceiling will not be applicable for
PSU banks while limit remains at 26% for insurance companies. Applications for
foreign investments in private banks having joint ventures in insurance sector
would be addressed to RBI for consideration in consultation with Irda.This is
necessary to ensure that the 26% equity cap in insurance sector is not being
breached.
[Source : The Economic Times]
Govt to modify DEPB rules
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25,
2004 12:07:38 AM
NEW DELHI: In a move to de-incentivise steel exports to
check rising local prices, the government decided to modify DEPB rules.
Steel producers exporting to countries with whom India has a
preferential trading agreement or a free trade agreement at a preferential
tariff, will get DEPB (duty entitlement passbook scheme) benefits, only to the
extent of the duty paid. They will not be accorded a flat rate, which is
usually higher. This move follows steel exporters claiming DEPB benefits
despite exporting the commodity at 0% duty. – Agencies
The authorities hope that the new rules will curb misuse of
the scheme. This will also check domestic prices, they added. The government is
also examining the possibility of cutting DEPB rates for steel exports, sources
said.
[Source : The Economic Times]
Up to 74% FDI ceiling hike in private banks soon
PTI[ WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2004
06:29:27 PM ]
NEW DELHI: The government will soon come up with detailed
guidelines for private banks including hike in the foreign holding
from 49 to 74 per cent and allowing foreign banks to set up
subsidiaries in the country.
"We have given the papers to Department of Industrial Policy and
Promotion. It (notification) may come tomorrow," Secretary for
financial sector, N S Sisodia, said on Wednesday.
The guidelines are being awaited by a host of private banks like
Centurion Bank, Global Trust Bank, IDBI Bank, who want to increase
their capital base and carry out expansions.
Foreign banks like HSBC, ABN AMRO Bank, Standard Chartered Bank
and Nova Scotia are also eyeing subsidiaries in India following the
relaxation of the FDI norms.
Although the Cabinet had approved the proposal for hiking FDI
ceiling in private banks on January 15, the Finance Ministry and
Reserve Bank were fine-tuning the guidelines.
The FDI hike in banking sector was first suggested by the N K
Singh panel but the Finance Ministry and RBI had added a slew of
stringent conditionalities to prevent ownership of banks going into
wrong hands.
Sources in the ministry said the guidelines would allow FDI
ceiling to go upto 74 per cent from the present 49 per cent but the
investors mandatorily need to get a credit rating and RBI's nod.
The overall 74 per cent foreign holding would include foreign
direct investment (FDI), foreign institutional investments (FII),
NRIs, initial public offers, private placements and ADRs/GDRs. The
FDI ceiling will not be applicable for PSU banks while limit remains
at 26 per cent for insurance companies.
[Source : The Economic Times]
PTI [MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2004]
NEW DELHI : The last date for filing of TDS
returns has been extended by six months to March 31 in view of
certain administrative difficulties.
An official release said the government had
extended the filing of TDS returns to September 2003 and now it had
been extended till the end of this fiscal.
[Source : Economic Times]
The finance ministry proposes to set up a
dedicated depository for facilitating use of stamp papers in demat
form and registering property deals across the country. Sources
divulged that the Revenue Department has been asked to initiate the
process for setting up the depository in consultation with states.
States like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra have already
been sounded out on the depository for stamp papers in demat form.
The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC)
decided to enhance the wage ceiling for purpose of coverage of
employees under the scheme from the existing Rs 6,500 per month to
Rs. 7,500.
The new ceiling would come into effect shortly,
an official release said. The ESIC cover is given to employees in
the private sector towards their medical treatment.
Employees up to a certain salary-scale have to
pay a monthly premium for this purpose.
[Source : Business Standard, December
17, 2003]
The Supreme Court allowed the Centre more time to
amend the Competition Commission Act, at the request of Attorney
General Soli Sorabjee. The case will now be heard on January 30.
Sorabjee said the government was not in favour of
deleting any particular provision in the law, and two ministers were
taking a comprehensive look at it, for which more time was needed.
During the last hearing, Chief Justice V N Khare
had asked the government to delete the provision (Section 39) in the
legislation, which sought to make the high court the executing court
for orders passed by the commission.
The court had said such a provision would affect
the independence of the judiciary as the commission, which was
mostly staffed with bureaucrats under the existing Act, would be
above the high court. The court had expressed serious reservations
about such a scheme of things. Sorbajee had sought time then to
consider the changes in the law. The sought more time to make the
necessary changes.
The petitioner, Brahm Dutt, had challenged the
appointment of former Commerce Secretary Dipak Chatterjee to the
head of the commission. Since then the appointment has been frozen.
The court has objected to the policy of
appointing bureaucrats to quasi-judicial bodies.
The judges had observed that if this was allowed,
the government would fill all the posts of judges with bureaucrats.
[Source : Business Standard, December
17, 2003]
The turf war between the Department of Company
Affairs (DCA) and Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for
overseeing the functioning of the listed companies continues
unabated.
The capital market regulator, it appears, is
still not happy with the powers vested with it under the Companies
Act, 1956, in respect of listed companies and has asked for more.
Official sources confirm that SEBI has now
written to the Finance Ministry seeking more powers under the
Companies Act for monitoring the listed public companies. However,
the capital market regulator's letter is said to be silent on the
provisions under the Act it would like to administer. At present,
Section 55 A of the Act confers SEBI the right to administer certain
provisions relating to the issue and transfer of securities and
non-payment of dividend in the case of listed public companies and
those companies that intend to get their securities listed.
Companies Act currently stipulates that all
powers relating to all other matters including those relating to
prospectus, statement in lieu of prospectus, return of allotment,
issue of shares and redemption of irredeemable preference shares
shall be exercised by the Central Government, Company Law Board,
Registrar of Companies as the case may be.
Informed sources said, there is no meeting point
between the DCA and SEBI on the powers that need to be further
conferred upon the capital market regulator for monitoring the
listed companies.
"What more powers do they want? They already
enjoy powers under Section 55 A. If they desire more, they will have
to clearly spell out and for this discussions are needed between all
concerned," Finance Ministry sources.
The tussle between the two regulators for
overseeing the functioning of listed companies has been there for
the last number of years leaving India Inc sometimes crying foul on
the regulatory overkill.
The composition of a company's board is one issue
on which the last word is yet to be written by the regulators, say
corporate observers.
[Source : Business Line, December 16,
2003]
REUTERS [TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16,
2003]
NEW DELHI: The government has approved plans to
increase the limit on foreign direct investment in private banks,
Finance Minister Jaswant Singh said on Tuesday.
In the Union Budget unveiled in February, the
government had announced its intention to raise the foreign direct
investment limit in private banks to 74 per cent from 49 per cent.
"The government has taken an in-principle
decision to enhance the limit on foreign direct investment in
banking companies to facilitate setting up of subsidiaries by
foreign banks and to invite investment in private sector banks,"
Singh said in a written reply to a lawmaker's question.
He said the modalities for implementing the
decision were being worked out.
British lender HSBC Holdings recently bought a
14.71 per cent in UTI Bank from other investors, with an option to
buy another 5.37 per cent later. It plans an open offer to pick up
an additional 20 per cent subsequently.
Private sector banking shares have rallied in
recent trading sessions as the market expects similar deals in the
sector after the government's decision to hike foreign investment.
[Source : Economic Times]
PTI [SUNDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In a major judgement, the Supreme
Court has ruled that a father can gift a reasonable portion of his
ancestral immovable property to daughters at the time of their
marriage or even long after their marriage.
This ruling was given by a Bench comprising
Justice R C Lahoti and Justice Ashok Bhan while settling a
15-year-old dispute between a father and his daughters in Salem
District of Tamil Nadu in favour of the latter by setting aside a
trial court order which was upheld by the Madras High Court.
Considering several rulings of the apex Court,
the Bench said "it can safely be held that a father can make a gift
of ancestral immovable property within reasonable limits, keeping in
view the total extent of the property held by the family in favour
of his daughter at the time of marriage or even long after her
marriage".
The father, Raja Gounder, had gifted some portion
of his ancestral land to his daughters in 1985 but five years later
alleged that the daughters, taking advantage of his addiction to
alcohol, had fradulently taken away the ancestral property which he
could not have gifted.
The trial Court and the High Court had ruled in
favour of the father saying he had no right to gift away ancestral
property except for pious purposes.
The Bench said the question as to whether a
particular gift was within reasonable limits or not has to be judged
according to the status of the family at the time of making a gift,
the extent of immovable property owned by the family and the extent
of property gifts.
"No hard and fast rule prescribing quantitative
limits of such a gift can be laid down. The answer to such a
question would vary from family to family," Justice Bhan said.
Taking the case in hand, the Bench said the
father had failed to plead the total extent of the ancestral
immovable property of the family and prove that the gift was
unreasonable taking the total extent of property into account.
Apart from this, the question of reasonableness
or otherwise of the gift made has to be assessed vis-a-vis the total
value of the property held by the family.
"Simply because the gifted property is a house,
it cannot be held that the gift made was not within the reasonable
limits," the apex Court said.
The Court said "it would depend on number of
factors such as the status of the family, total value of the
property held by the family and the value of the gifted property and
so on."
However, on facts, if it was found that the gift was not within
reasonable limits, such a gift would not be upheld, the Supreme
Court said and added it was for those challenging the gift to prove
that the gift made by the father was excessive or unreasonable,
keeping in view, the total holding of the family.
[Source : Economic Times]
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [FRIDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2003]
NEW DELHI : The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Sick Industrial
Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Bill, ’03, paving the way for
the government to implement the amendments to the Companies Act,
1956, pertaining to insolvency of companies, that had been cleared
by the Parliament during the ’02 winter session.
The repeal of the Act will result in the scrapping of the Board for
Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and the Appellate Authority
for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR), and in the
creation of National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law
Appellate Tribunal as envisaged in the Companies (Second Amendment)
Bill ’02.
The department of company affairs (DCA) has already set up a search
panel to identify the members to be nominated to the tribunal. The
NCLT is to be set up with a maximum of 62 members and a president,
who is qualified to be a judge. The NCLT will subsume the
jurisdiction of the Company Law Board and the BIFR. The jurisdiction
of High Courts to approve mergers and acquisitions of companies
would also be transferred to the new tribunal. The NCLT shall
comprise of judicial and technical members.
Replying to a debate on the SICA Repeal Bill, finance minister
Jaswant Singh said that the move would help in the expeditious
rehabilitation of sick companies, which was not possible under the
BIFR regime.
Cases pending with the BIFR were those where 100% net worth of the
companies had eroded, Mr Singh said, adding that under the Companies
Act, companies with erosion of 50% of its net worth would
automatically be referred to the Tribunal.
The company concerned and its board of directors would then have to
furnish information and the scheme for rehabilitation.
The minister informed the House that the Companies Act has special
provisions to protect workers interests.
[Source : Economic Times]
PTI [WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In a bid to check money laundering and terror funding
through banking channels, RBI will come up with stringent directives
for banks by April 2004, which among others, would enable the
regulator to trace ‘suspicious’ transactions.
RBI intends to revamp the present ‘Know Your Customer (KYC)’
principle, come out with a blacklist of countries and people
involved in terror funding and make it mandatory for banks to report
‘suspicious’ transactions, senior bank officials said.
The new guidelines would be implemented from the second quarter of
2004-05. RBI is co-ordinating with the finance ministry, especially
the income tax department on this issue. Apart from RBI, the other
two regulators, Sebi and Irda, would also put in place systems for
tracing dubious transactions in the near future.
RBI deputy governor K J Udeshi did not like to divulge details but
said “the impact of money laundering is now beginning to extend from
economic crimes to international terrorism.”
“As financial transactions grow more complex, it becomes more
difficult for banks to maintain a customer profile. The challenge,
therefore, is to ensure that banks know their customers without
hindering the smooth flow of financial transactions,” she said
addressing a banking conference here.
Referring to RBI’s present guidelines on KYC principle, she said
“the basic aim is to prevent banks being unwillingly used as a
channel for funds derived from criminal activity or financing
terrorism.”
The guideline relates to identification of depositors and systems
and procedures to control financial frauds, of money laundering and
suspicious activities and scrutiny and monitoring of large-value
transactions, she said.
Confirming the developments, Oriental Bank of Commerce chairman B D
Narang said monitoring of suspicious transactions would be
tightened. Banks would be setting up ‘Anti-Money Laundering Cells’
for this purpose, which would co-ordinate with RBI, he said.
The banks are expecting the new RBI directive in April next year and
it would be implemented by second quarter of 2004, he said. The move
assumes importance in the wake of the new Money Laundering Act,
which broadly laid down the guidelines. But RBI was asked to come up
with detailed directive for enabling the government to trace money
laundering and terror funding.
[Source : Economic Times]
K G NARENDRANATH
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [MONDAY, DECEMBER 08, 2003]
NEW DELHI : There is bad news for pharma MNCs, and great relief to
their domestic counterparts, as the government has drafted the
Patents (Third Amendment) Bill and plans to push it for an early
passage by the Parliament.
According to official sources, the amendment, primarily designed to
meet the TRIPS obligation of extending product patents to pharma and
agrochemical sectors effective from January 1, ’05, will not tinker
with the provision of compulsory licensing. That is, grounds for
issuance of the compulsory licence (CL) will not be expanded or
fortified and will remain as they have been since the second
amendment that became effective from May ‘03. “No country has a more
effective safeguards against abuse of CL. We, therefore, don’t
intend to tinker with the Chapter 16 of the Act that deals with CL,”
officials said.
CL is the crucial determinant of the business models of pharma
companies in the impending product patent regime. MNCs have been
saying that the CL facility as it is today is too easily accessible
and therefore will virtually negate just use of patents. The MNCs
want the CL to be more sparingly available, while the Indian drug
companies demand broader application of the licensing.
Broadly speaking, CL is a TRIPS-compliant vehicle to side-step
patents, to enable the government to take steps to ensure
accessibility and sometimes affordability of medicines to the
population, given certain stated eventualities, particularly if and
when the existence of the patent thwarts such objectives.
Definition of patentability also will not change under the new
amendment, officials added. This means that pharma MNCs will not be
allowed patent prolongation by seeking exclusivity for new uses, or
dosage forms of the same invention, they added.
A patentable invention will continue to be something “new, involving
an inventive step, and capable of industrial application,” and
anything that does not stand to such scrutiny will be ineligible for
patents. The contentious question of patenting of micro-organisms
will also be addressed by the same norm, implying that
micro-organisms as they occur in nature will not be patentable,
while isolation of an organism by involving an inventive step might
make the isolated organism patentable. “We clearly distinguish
inventions from discoveries. Only inventions are patentable,” the
sources clarified.
The maximum time allowable between filing of a patent and its
sealing (grant) will be fixed as 26 months (This has been
practically 5-6 years now in most cases until recently). In the
principal legislation (the Act), there will only be a new
incorporation regarding each phase of processing to the effect that
the processing will be done “within the period prescribed.”
In the subordinate legislation, (the rules), the timeframes will be
specified so that the maximum time for sealing from date of filing
will be 26 months, officials said.
Currently, it is mandatory that filing and publication of an
application are distanced by 18 months. This will be reduced to one
month.
In order to facilitate export of drugs under the Paragraph 6
provision of the Doha declaration, the third amendment will bring a
provision for issuance of “complementary compulsory licence” to an
Indian company in case it obtains a licence from a foreign
government for export of drugs under the CL.
The department of industrial policy and promotion will soon move a
Cabinet note on the third amendment. The note has already been sent
to ministries of science and technology and HRD, health and family
welfare and chemicals and fertiliser for comments.
[Source : Economic Times]
The President has given his assent to
the Patents
(Amendment) Bill, 2002 as passed by the parliament in its Budget Session ending May
17, 2002. more...
PTI [SATURDAY, DECEMBER 06, 2003]
MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India has permitted Indian listed
companies to disinvest their holdings in a joint venture or
wholly-owned subsidiary abroad.
This would be applicable in cases where it may result in a write-off
of the capital invested to the extent of 10 per cent of the previous
year's export realisation.
RBI, in a notification here today, said other terms and conditions
and reporting requirements would remain unchanged in this regard.
[Source : Economic Times]
AGENCIES [SATURDAY, DECEMBER 06, 2003]
MUMBAI: The RBI has allowed investments by NRIs or persons of Indian
origin (PIOs) in the capital of an entity or a proprietary concern
on a non-repatriation basis, subject to certain norms. The amount
invested would not be eligible for repatriation outside India
provided it has been made by inward remittances out of non-resident
external or foreign currency non-resident account or non-resident
ordinary account, the central bank said in a notification to
authorised dealers. The RBI pointed out that the investments were
subject to the firm or proprietary concern not being engaged in any
agricultural plantation or real estate business, or not holding any
immovable property with a view to earning profit or earning income.
[Source : Economic Times]
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [SATURDAY, DECEMBER 06, 2003]
NEW DELHI : THE government has introduced the Bill which seeks,
among other things, to reduce the interest rate on direct tax
refunds paid by the government and delayed payments by the assessee
and prune the tax collection at source rate of IMFL.
The government had earlier promulgated an ordinance to reduce the
interest rate on refunds from 8% to 6% and on delayed payments from
15% to 12% to align it with the market rates. Besides the Income Tax
Act 1961, amendments are also required in the Wealth Tax Act, 1957
and the Expenditure Tax Act, 1987. The TCS on IMFL was pruned to 1%.
The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2003, introduced by minister of
state for finance Shripad Y Naik, also seeks to amend section 206C
of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to reduce the TCS rate on alcoholic
liquor for human consumption and scrap, timber and other forest
produce, tendu leaves, besides excluding the Central Government,
State Government, clubs and embassies from the definition of buyers.
It also seeks to clarify that collection of tax at source shall be
made from buyers at each stage of sale of the specified goods except
the last stage where the goods are purchased for personal
consumption.
The other provisions include an income tax exemption on interest
paid by the ship-breaking industry outside India for purchasing a
ship from outside India for the purpose of ship breaking and a100%
income tax deduction of the profits derived from export of wood
based handicraft items keeping in view problems faced by exporters
of such articles.
Introducing the Bill, Mr Naik, said the legislation was also
required to give income-tax exemption to interest payable to the
Nordic Investment Bank.
[Source : Economic Times]
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [THURSDAY, DECEMBER 04, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In tune with ongoing liberalisation of FDI policies, the
government on Wednesday permitted issue of equity shares against all
external commercial borrowings (excluding those deemed as ECBs)
received in convertible foreign currency (CFC).
The conversion of ECB into equity would be subject to meeting all
tax liabilities and procedures, according to an industry ministry
press release. Issue of equity shares against lumpsum fee, royalty
and ECBs in CFC already due for payment/repayment, subject to all
applicable tax liabilities and procedures have been permitted.
The government also plans to allow the FDI proposals involving
conversion of ECB into equity through the automatic approval route,
along with a few other categories of FDI.
[Source : Economic Times]
PTI [ FRIDAY, DECEMBER 05, 2003]
NEW DELHI: A bill to grant income tax exemptions in certain areas
and to reduce interest chargeable and payable to assessees was
introduced in Lok Sabha today.
The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2003, also aims to provide
income tax exemption on interest paid by the ship-breaking industry
outside India for purchasing a ship from outside India for the
purpose of ship breaking.
The bill was necessitated in the wake of demands for providing 100
per cent income tax deduction of the profits derived from export of
wood based handicraft items keeping in view unique problems faced by
exporters of such articles.
"Certain trade associations made certain representations for giving
income-tax benefit to all hand made based articles or things", says
the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the bill.
Introducing the Bill, Minister of State for Finance Shripad Yesso
Naik, said the legislation was also required to give income-tax
exemption to interest payable to the Nordic Investment Bank, a
multilateral financial institution constituted by Governments of
Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, on a loan advanced by
it to a project approved by the Central Government.
The bill also aims to reduce interest chargeable from the assessees
and interest payable to the assessees under the Income Tax Act,
1961, the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 and the Expenditure Tax Act, 1987 in
view of the reduction in the interest rates prevailing in the
market.
[Source : Economic Times]
RBI simplifies rules for exporters
PTI [SUNDAY, DECEMBER 07, 2003]
MUMBAI: With a view to simplifying procedures and providing full
flexibility to exporters, Reserve Bank of India has allowed them to
write off outstanding export dues, and extend the prescribed period
of realisation beyond 180 days, albeit subject to certain
conditions.
The exporters, including status holders, would be permitted this
facility provided the aggregate value of such export bills
written-off (including reduction in invoice value) and bills
extended for realisation does not exceed 10 per cent of export
proceeds due during the calendar year and are not a subject of
investigation by Enforcement Directorate or CBI or any other
investigating agency, RBI said in a notification here today.
This facility would be available for exports undertaken after July
one, 2003 and whose proceeds are due for realisation on January one,
2004 , it said.
In the case of exports where RBI has prescribed longer period of
realisation, the facility would be available for exports prior to
July 2003, but proceeds of which were due for realisation within the
prescribed period of one year.
Exporters dealing with more than one authorised dealer (AD) can
avail of this facility through each AD within the set limit, the
central bank said.
However, exporters operating under a consortium of banks or with
multiple banks would also have the option of computing the 10 per
cent limit on an aggregate basis provided the lead bank or a nodal
bank undertakes to verify the exporter's annual performance, it
added.
[Source : Economic Times]
National Tax Tribunal ruffles legal feathers - AIFTP to contest Ordinance provisions
[November 4, 2003] All mega tax payers of the country must be prepared to travel to the five places where the Benches of the recently constituted National Tax Tribunal (NTT) will be set up, if they are thinking of filing a tax appeal.
Did we hear someone say that the pendency of tax cases is bound to rise in the NTT also, as there would be only 10 Benches each of direct and indirect taxes, which was less than the collective number of Benches supposed to function in a High Court.
According to some leading tax advocates, if CAs and retired Chief Income-Tax Commissioners are going to sit on the NTT Benches, sooner or later, the legal fraternity may demand that they should be permitted to conduct tax audit or even statutory audit.
The setting up of a NTT through an ordinance without invoking a proper national debate on how and why such a major judicial body with full powers of the High Court seems to have encountered a serious challenge, ironically though, in the law courts. Tax experts and lawyers are questioning the constitutional validity of such an ordinance, especially when the National Tax Tribunal Bill 2003 was now pending before Parliament.
The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners (AIFTP) is planning to move the Bombay High Court this week to challenge the constitutional validity of NTT. Petitions are also likely to be filed by the same body in Ahmedabad, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, and even Kolkata.
Eminent tax practitioners like Dr Debi Pal, former president of AIFTP, are said to be spearheading the movement against the NTT. The common view among tax lawyers is that such a body was thought of many times in the past, culminating in the Bill, and suddenly, why push it through so hurriedly with the help of an Ordinance, without a national debate.
Mr K. Shivaram, President of AIFTP, told Business Line from his Mumbai office, "While we have no quarrel with such a national body, various provisions of the NTT ordinance are highly questionable, especially as these deal with substantial questions of law". How can you appoint someone with no judicial training as a Technical Member on the NTT Bench? he asked. He said only 10 per cent of the tax appeals go to the High Courts as 90 per cent of these go to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). And the tax department leads in the number of appeals filed, even though some 90 per cent of the cases in courts are decided in favour of the assessees.
What has actually ruffled weathers is the move to appoint tax administrators and chartered accountants on the NTT Benches with little or no exposure to substantial questions of law. A key question being raised is whether the NTT, which would replace the High Courts in disposal of all tax appeals, would have full independence enjoyed by the High Courts or will it be subjected to executive control ?
According to Mr A.K. Chatterjee, Chairman, Bar Council of West Bengal, the move to dispose of pending tax cases in High Courts through such a medium of a NTT was, in his opinion, unconstitutional. Judiciary is one of the pillars of our society and how can you truncate it like this? he asked.
Says Mr Narayan P. Jain, Professor of Law at West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences: "This experiment of the Government may not succeed as the Supreme Court itself may be flooded with tax appeals, as the NTT verdicts may come too quickly, if non-judicial members are going to help decide the cases."
Pointing out that the NTT was not the solution for reducing pendency of tax cases in courts, he said, as felt by AIFTP, more Benches should be set up in High Courts for speedy disposal of tax appeals.
A major irritant among the various provisions, according to him, was section 15(4) of the Ordinance, which makes part payment of tax (25 per cent of tax or duty payable) mandatory, even before the matter is adjudicated.
This condition did not apply while filing appeals before
High Courts. There is, however, a proviso, which says that the NTT
may waive this condition, if it felt that it could cause undue
hardship to assessees.
[Source : Business Line]
Cabinet okays for income-tax ombudsman
[November 3, 2003] The Union Cabinet gave its nod for the setting up of an income- tax ombudsman to resolve individual complaints of tax payers and improve the quality of tax administration. However, no statutory powers will be vested with the ombudsman.
To begin with, the ombudsman will be established in the four metros - Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai. Complaints can be made if there are delays say, in issue of refunds beyond time limits prescribed by the CBDT, allotment of PAN, in disposal of rectification application of the assessee, in giving effect to appellate orders, release of seized books of accounts and assets after completion of proceedings under the IT Act and so on.
The powers of the ombudsman would include receiving
complaints from the tax payer, seek explanations from IT officials,
give prima facie findings on whether the grievance has any merit and
suggest remedial redressal measures.
[Source : Economic Times]
RBI cannot grant banking licence to cooperatives: SC
PTI [October 31, 2003]
In a major ruling affecting the banking sector, the Supreme Court has held that Reserve Bank of India cannot grant banking licence to cooperative societies registered under Multi-State Act without the NABARD declaring it as a state, central or primary cooperative bank.
A Bench comprising Justice S N Variava and Justice H K Sema gave this ruling while directing the RBI to forthwith revoke the banking licence given to the Apex Cooperative Bank of Urban Bank of Maharashtra and Goa Ltd.
Rejecting the contention of RBI that it was competent to grant licence to a cooperative bank under Multi State Act, the Bench said so far as Banking Regulation Act was concerned, the term "cooperative bank" had a definite meaning and the RBI could not go by any other meaning given to the same term for the purpose of issuing banking licence.
"We hold that the RBI by virtue of its power under Section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act cannot grant licence to any cooperative bank unless it is a state cooperative bank or a central cooperative bank or a primary cooperative bank.
It would be necessary that a declaration under the NABARD Act must be first obtained," Justice Variava
said writing for the Bench.
[Source : Press Trust of India]
Exporters get more options to file rebate claims
[October 30, 2003] Exporters can now file rebate claims and execute bonds or a letter of undertaking at all Central excise commissionerates in the country. The facility has so far been available only in eight or 10 locations.
The facility of filing rebate claims by exporters has been extended to all commissionerates where ports, airports, land customs stations or export post offices are located, a finance ministry release said. This has been done taking into account the growing international trade through minor ports.
Exporters will now have more options to file claims for rebate of Central excise paid from the place where the export takes place. This is in addition to the facility of filing the rebate claims before the jurisdictional assistant or deputy commissioners where export goods are manufactured or warehoused. Exporters who export goods under bond or letter of undertaking without payment of excise duty will also benefit.
The government has been taking steps for trade
facilitation with a view to reducing the transaction cost of exports
which is estimated at as high as 14 per cent in some cases.
[Source : Economic Times]
National Tax Tribunal Ordinance challenged in Madras HC
[October 30, 2003] The Madras High Court declined to stay implementation of a recent central ordinance creating a tribunal for disposing of tax appeals.
"We are not inclined to grant any ex-parte stay till the counter filed", a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice B Subhashan Reddy and Justice A Kulasekharan said while hearing a writ petition challenging the "National Tax Tribunal Ordinance" promulgated by the centre on october 16 last.
The Judges, however, made it clear that "if any appointment is made it will be subject to further orders as may be passed by this court".
The petitioner -- Revenue Bar Association, had sought to declare the ordinance as violative of the basic structure of the constitution and ultra vires of its articles 14, 19 (1) (g),123, 245, 246 and 323 (D).
The petitioner had also sought an interim stay of the ordinance till disposal of the petition.
Contending that the National Tax Tribunal Bill 2003 was pending before parliament, the petitioner said there was no emergent or extraordinary situation to warrant the ordinance.
Pointing out that the tribunal would replace high courts
in disposal of tax appeals, the association claimed that the
tribunal could not have the independence enjoyed by high court as it
would be completely subjected to executive control.
[Source : Economic Times]
PTI [ WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 01, 2003
]
NEW DELHI: The government has extended the last
date for filing of income-tax returns to October 3 instead of
September 30, which was a bank holiday.
The extension would be applicable to individuals,
Hindu Undivided Families and other non-corporate assessees, which
are not required to be audited as per Income Tax Act, an official
release said here on Wednesday.
Earlier, the last date for filing of IT returns
was extended from July 31 to September 30
[ Source : Economics Times ]
SHAJI
VIKRAMAN & HEMA RAMAKRISHNAN
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 16, 2003]
NEW DELHI: The government is
vetting a proposal to liberalise the norms on transfer of gifts from
resident Indians to non-resident Indians by seeking to put such
investment proposals on the automatic route subject to the sectoral
caps.
The existing rules provide
for gifts by local citizens to NRIs or Persons of Indian Origin who
are close relatives upto a monetary ceiling of Rs 10 lakh. However,
being secondary market transactions, such proposals have to be
approved by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). The
government is now looking at a proposal to allow these transactions
without having to go through the FIPB route as long as they fall
within the FDI caps.
“We need to have an
administrative delegation of powers for gifting shares to NRIs
abroad, instead of coming to the FIPB,” a senior finance ministry
official said. The delegation of powers could be to the RBI.
The government in
consultation with the RBI is also looking at raising the existing
limit of Rs 10 lakh given the comfort provided by the foreign
exchange reserves which have topped the $87bn mark. The
liberalisation on this front could mainly in respect of shares or
securities of companies which are not listed or information
technology start-ups by further
enhancing the monetary limit for gifting shares to relatives abroad.
But in the next round of
liberalisation, a cap may well be imposed on the percentage of the
equity capital of a company which can be transferred as gifts
instead of a monetary ceiling, according to officials. Otherwise,
this route could well be misused, they reckon. A fuller opening up
of the gift route would be in the last stage of capital account
convertibility.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
[ TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 ]
NEW DELHI: Marking yet
another milestone in the ongoing “internationalisation” of India’s
intellectual property rights (IPR)-related laws, the amended laws on
trademark and geographical indications of goods came into effect on
Tuesday.
The changed pieces of
legislation would enable compatibility of these parts of India’s IPR
legal structure with the TRIPS agreement.
The Intellectual Property
Appellate Board in Chennai would now be operational with Justice S
Jagadeesan, formerly of the Madras High Court, as its chairman,
according to a press note issued here today by the Department of
Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP).
The vice-chairman of the
board would be Raghbir Singh, former secretary, National Commission,
who will review the working of the Constitution, while TS
Subramanian, former joint registrar of trademarks, would be a
member. Benches of the Appellate Board will also sit in Ahmedabad,
Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata in addition to Chennai, the government has
said.
The two new pieces of
legislation — the Trade Marks Act 1999 and the rules thereunder
notified in February ‘02 and the Geographical Indications of Goods
(Registration & Protection) Act 1999 and the rules thereunder
published in March ‘02 — essentially aim at strengthening the IPR
protection in the respective areas.
As for the trademarks, the
amended Act would provide for 10-year term for trademark
registrations as against seven years at present. It would also
introduce concepts of “service marks” and “collective marks” to the
Indian system. Besides, a new genre called “well-known marks” would
be created. The marks qualified as well-known marks under specified
criteria would receive higher levels of protection as they are more
vulnerable to presumptive imitations. There would also be a
provision for single register and simplification of procedures.
The proposed changes would
be in tune with the rise in economic value of trademarks as
corporate assets. Under the new system, contesting the validity of a
registered mark would be more difficult. The amended Act on
geographical indications of goods would, for the first time in
India, provide for registration and better protection of
geographical indications in relation to merchandise that derive
their exclusivity from their place of origin such as Basmati rice,
Darjeeling Tea, Agra petha, Bikaner bujia or Kancheepuram saree.
These products, if the respective communities so wish, would now
have stronger protection from fraudulent copycats, than what they
currently may have under the “certificates of trademark”.
The new GE registry has been
set up in Chennai and the government would begin receiving
applications to the registry. The change in the law is on the lines
of the British and French laws in this regard that frustrate
deceitful commercial use of the celebrated distinctions of products
such as Scotch whisky and Champagne. The applicant would have to
register not only the product by name, but also comprehensively
describe for record the distinguishing features of the product.
An expert committee would
verify the claims before granting the registration. As a form of IPR,
geographical indications are distinct from other forms like patents,
trademarks and copyrights, because the ownership of the rights in
this case is with a “community” or a “group of people” rather than
an individual or a corporate or non-corporate firm as is the case
with other IPRs.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
[TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 09, 2003]
The Government has extended the last date of
filing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) Return by two months to
November, 30. Returns have to be filed for tax deducted in the
previous year 2002-2003.
The last date for filing TDS returns was earlier
extended uniformly to September, 2003 to give effect to certain
proposals in the Finance Act, 2003 relating to the filing of TDS
returns.
As per the provisions of the Income Tax Act,
1961, annual return for the TDS under various sections of the Act
are to furnished by persons responsible for such deduction at
end-April, May, June of the financial year following the previous
year in which tax was deducted at source.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
[WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 03, 2003]
The Union Cabinet has cleared finance ministry's
proposal to reduce interest rate on delayed corporate and income tax
refunds from 8% to 6% by aligning it with the weighted average rate
of the 364 day T-Bill. The interest rate on delayed payments made by
the assessee to Government will also be pruned from 15% to 12%. The
Cabinet also cleared a cut in the rate on tax collection at source
on Indian made foreign liquor and industrial scrap, from 10% less
than 3%.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
I-T to follow fresh rules to scrutinise tax returns by cos.
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [SUNDAY, AUGUST 24, 2003]
NEW DELHI: The Finance Ministry has decided to
release new guidelines for scrutinising tax returns filed by
corporates.
The guidelines will be different from those for
non-corporate assessees. The government will use the database
available with the Centre For Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) to
select cases for scrutiny of corporate assessees. The selection
criteria may include book profits (above a certain limit), paid-up
capital, debt raised during a financial year and so on.
The decision to have separate guidelines for these segments marks
a policy change as there has been no such distinction till now. The
move comes six months after the FM’s announcement to abolish the
discretion-based system of selecting returns. A computer-generated
random selection of about 2% of the returns annually will be brought
in instead.
As it will take some more time to have a complete database on all
taxpayers, a small window will be open for manual selection (search
and seizure cases, surveys, frauds, scam cases and so on). Transfer
pricing cases will be picked up for scrutiny wherever the aggregate
value of the global transaction exceeds Rs. 5 crore and reference
under the relevant section is made to the transfer pricing officer.
For corporate assessees, 95% of the scrutiny cases will be computer
generated.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
100% tax benefit to business houses for sports' promotion
PTI [ TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In a move to give boost to sports in a big way, Prime
Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on Tuesday said the government may
consider granting 100 per cent tax benefit to business houses for
promotion of various sports activities.
The Finance Ministry may consider the suggestion for granting 100
per cent tax benefit to business houses for creation and maintenance
of sports infrastructure, sponsoring sports championships, and for
sponsoring sportspersons for participation in international sports
meets", he said inaugurating the All India Sports Congress.
He told a
gathering of eminent sports personalities that he would
convene a meeting of all the leading business houses to encourage
them to substantially enhance their support to sports.
Besides acceding to the request to rename the existing Sports
Development Fund as Prime Minister's Sports Development Fund and to
treat it on par with the Prime Minister's Relief Fund to attract
more contributions, he also announced that sports bodies would be
allowed to generate their own resources for maintenance, upgradation
and creation of facilities and "no deduction will be made from their
non-plan allocation".
Urging sportspersons to develop a “strong winner's instint”,
Vajpayee said as in most developed and even in some developing
countries, the subject of sports needed to become an integral part
of the educational curriculum and effective steps should be taken in
this direction.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Dividend stripping: Assessees can't benefit
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2003]
MUMBAI: A commissioner (Appeal), the first
appellate authority on direct tax matters, has ruled that assessees
cannot benefit from a dividend stripping transaction, jargon for
buying MF units at the time of dividend announcement and selling it
at post dividend price for recording a loss which is used to claim a
tax benefit. The ruling is along the lines of similar rulings by
appellate commissioners denying tax benefits for such transactions.
According to the CIT (A) in Mumbai, the intention
behind most such transactions is not investment but tax avoidance.
This is sufficient ground under the I-T Act to deny tax benefits.
Since the intention is to record a loss that can
be used for setting off a gain (save tax), such transactions do not
deserve the tax benefit intended to encourage genuine investments,
the Commissioner (Appeals) held.
It is learnt many assessing officers and
appellate commissioners have ruled against assessees seeking tax
benefits through dividend stripping. The I-T department says
everybody involved in the transaction benefits except the exchequer.
The finance company that lends money to buy MF
units benefits as does the mutual funds because of the increased
demand for its units. The broker who arranges the deal also gets a
commission.
Finally the taxpayer who can set off his gains
against the artificial loss recorded through these means also
benefits.
The grounds given by the Commissioner (Appeal)
are as follows: the motive for the original purchase of units was
quick profit and not investment. The shorter the period, the greater
the probability that the intention was not investment.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Finmin wants more 'persons' in info-tax net
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2003]
NEW DELHI: Stock-brokers, car dealers and other assessees may not be the only ones who will be required to file
annual information returns from the ensuing financial year. The
finance ministry is looking at widening the ambit to include persons
who are not necessarily assessees.
The move will require an amendment to the Income
Tax Act, which states that any “assessee” who conducts a financial
transaction - specified by the revenue department - will have to
furnish an annual information return about those involved in the
transaction within a stipulated time period. The idea is to replace
the word “assessee” with “person” so that the responsibility to
furnish details falls on whomsoever the department wants to collect
information from, even if they are not assessees. Internal
consultations have been kicked off to finalise the class and value
of transactions for which information returns have to be furnished.
The law ministry will have to be consulted in case a decision is
taken to widen the coverage.
The objective of the mandatory filing of information returns is
to keep a tab on high net worth individuals. The tax information
network (TIN), which is expected to be in place soon, will receive
information returns for digitisation on behalf of the tax
administration.
The move to insert a new section in the Income Tax Act relating
to the furnishing of annual information returns from assessment year
‘04-05 (financial year ‘03-04) was based on the recommendations of
the Kelkar Committee.
Under the present dispensation, the central information branch (CIB)
functioning under the director general (investigation) collects
information relating to financial transactions from various external
and internal sources. The CBDT, in its long-term action plan for
information collection, has listed out 37 broad categories of
external and internal sources. The power to call for information
(Section 133 B) and the powers relating to producing evidence
(Section 131) constitute the main legal base for the process.
Besides, the department has also made it mandatory for assessees to
quote PAN for designated transactions.
Under Section 133 (6) of the IT Act, firms, companies, dealers,
brokers, agents, banks can be called upon to provide the name and
address of persons engaged in transactions with them. The
information is then disseminated to the CIB. The existing system, it
is reckoned, has not delivered results.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Senior citizens can certify own income for I-T
AGENCIES [TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In a major relief to senior citizens, the government
today reverted to the old system of self-declaration of income for
filing tax returns.
A notification from the Central Board of Direct Taxes said Income
Tax rules of 1962 have been amended to allow senior citizens to
furnish a self-declaration in the prescribed
Form-15H. The self-declaration facility was withdrawn in Budget
2002, in case the income or the aggregates of specified income
exceeded Rs 50,000 per annum.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Electronic filing of IT returns from Friday
PRIYA RANJAN DASH
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [THURSDAY, AUGUST 07, 2003]
NEW DELHI: The finance ministry on Wednesday
announced that salaried taxpayers can avail the facility to file
their income-tax return electronically from Friday. This is an
optional scheme and offers an additional mode of filing returns to
the taxpayers.
Finance Minister Jaswant Singh had announced the
scheme in the budget this year. In the first stage, it will be
introduced in Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi, Ahemdabad,
Bangalore and Hyderabad.
Under the scheme, an eligible taxpayer can
furnish his return to one of the intermediaries authorised for this
purpose, who will transcribe and transmit the data on the paper form
to IT department. The intermediaries will also provide the facility
of preparing the returns of income of taxpayers at their request on
the basis of documents provided by these taxpayers.
It will be the responsibility of the intermediary
to file the 'e-Return' as also the paper return in the income tax
office and deliver the acknowledgement to the taxpayers.
Intermediaries will also provide additional
value-added services like door-step collection and delivery of
documents, at their option.
The returns filed under this scheme will be
processed on priority basis and refunds, if any, will be issued
within one month from the date of filing of the paper return.
For the current financial year, Bharat Overseas
Bank, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank and UTI
Bank have been authorised to act as intermediaries.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Govt, trade bodies discuss Patent Act amendments
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 06, 2003]
NEW DELHI: The government has kicked off the
process for the third amendment to the Patents Act 1970, which would
mark the introduction of the TRIPS-mandated product patents regime
in the country for food, drugs and pharmaceuticals and chemicals.
The amendment would also throw open the possibility of introducing
provisions that cater to domestic constituency, even as the
country’s obligation of making the legislation TRIPS-compliant
before the year ’05 is being fulfilled.
Beginning the consultation process for the third
amendment, the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP)
today organised a one-day session with Assocham, CII and Ficci and a
cross-section of various IPR-related interest groups and
stakeholders. Inaugurating the session, commerce and industry
minister Arun Jaitley said the amendment would be fully balanced
with the concerns of national and public interest, especially those
relating to public health in India.
With the process being set in motion, issues on
which the stakeholders are at loggerheads even after the first and
second amendments of ’99 and ’02 - grounds for issuance of
compulsory licences, `parallel imports’ and `exhaustion of patent
rights’, `technology transfer’, `patentable inventions’, `abuse of
patents’ and sundry definitions - are being placed afresh for
debate. ``This is the next milestone in India’s IPR law. We propose
to have extensive consultations with all stakeholders before
finalising the provisos,’’ the official said. The government is
planning to hold 15-20 interactive sessions in different cities in
the country in the next six to eight weeks.
Referring to the debate a decade ago which was
marked by apprehensions that medicines would have to be paid for in
dollars due to signing of TRIPS agreement by India, Mr. Jaitley said:
"Let alone having to pay in dollars, India is getting ready to
supply quality drugs to the rest of the world, at prices equivalent
in rupees. This is a significant change that has taken place in the
last one decade.’’
With our large knowledge base and propensity for
research, why should we be on the backfoot as far as IPR protection
is concerned?, asked the minister. The first amendment to the
Patents Act had extended the facility of product patents to
agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals.
The second amendment in ‘02 incorporated national
emergency, circumstances of extreme urgency and for public
non-commercial use of patented product as grounds for invoking
compulsory licence. It also explained, although not to the
satisfaction of all, what would and would not be patentable. Now,
there are demands for review of the grounds for compulsory
licensing, as the second amendment allegedly did not make full use
of the flexibility provided by Doha Declaration on TRIPS and public
health. Some feel that abuse of patent rights by the patentee --
reckoned on the basis of high price or lack of insufficient
availability - can be a ground for issuing CL and the patentee
should not be required to be convinced of the abuse by the seeker of
compulsory licence. Also, since the patentee is deemed to have
exhausted his right when there is case for parallel import from a
secondary source, the question of payment of royalty to the patentee
should not arise. The patentee should be mandated to transfer the
technology to the CL holder, on payment of incremental royalty. In
addition to national emergency, a ``health emergency’’ should also
be reason for invoking CL. Health emergency should be distinctly
defined and the power to declare such emergency should vest with the
health ministry. Declaring a national emergency is process that
requires legislative and presidential assents and there should be
broader ground for invoking CL and under easier practical terms.
There should also be differential appeals for
economic and legal issues. While the proposed appellate tribunal, as
brought in with the second amendment, can settle disputes when the
patent controller’s decisions are questioned, an administrative
committee should arbitrate disputes of economic purport. While the
first amendment to the Act in ’98 provided for product patents in
pharmaceuticals and agro-chemicals, there is demand that product
patents be given for food and fine chemicals as well.
The government is taking note of these proposals
from the domestic lobbies as well as grouse of some multinational
corporations, mainly pharma MNCs, that India’s patent law is weak
and not completely TRIPS-compliant, while attempting the Third
Amendment.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
SC bans strike by Government employees
ECONOMICTIMES.COM [WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 06, 2003]
NEW DELHI: In a landmark judgement, the Supreme
Court on Wednesday ruled that government employees under no
circumstances have any fundamental legal or moral right to go on
strike.
Delivering a judgement, while disposing of
petitions pertaining to Tamil Nadu government employees strike, a
Bench comprising Justice MB Shah and Justice AR Lakshmanan said
"even the trade unions, who have a guaranteed right for collective
bargaining, have no right to go on strike".
Justice Shah writing the judgment for the bench
said "no political party or organisation can claim a right to
paralyse the economic and industrial activities of a state or nation
or inconvenience citizens."
The bench said, government employees cannot
complain that they can hold society to ransom by going on strike to
ventilate their grievances.
Justice Shah said there are various other ways
for ventillating the grievances and observed "strike results in
total chaos and mal-administration."
In a major concession, the Tamil Nadu government
had on Tuesday agreed to take back 8,063 employees out of the 14,135
not reinstated even as the Supreme Court directed appointment of
three retired Judges of the Madras High Court to decide within a
month representations of the dismissed staff.
Terming the concession as "gracious", a Bench
comprising Justice MB Shah and Justice AR Lakshmanan had also
directed the State to treat 2,794 secretariat staff and government
employees holding higher posts as having been placed under
suspension instead of being dismissed.
The state government had dismissed 1.76 lakh
employees invoking an ESMA Ordinance but on the intervention of the
apex Court had agree to take back 1,56,106 employees who furnished
an apology and undertaking not to indulge in strike in future.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Trade unions flay SC's verdict on strikes
IANS [WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 06, 2003]
NEW DELHI: Trade unions and Opposition parties
reacted with anger and shock on Wednesday to a Supreme Court ruling
that government employees had no legal or moral right to strike
work.
Labelling the judgement retrograde, unprecedented
and an attack on the basic tenets of democracy, trade union leaders
said they were horrified.
"This is a conspiracy to snatch our fundamental
right to strike. Nobody can take it away. If it is taken away, then
what is left of the trade unions? Nothing," said Swadesh Deb Roy,
secretary of the Centre for Indian Trade Union (CITU).
"So it is matter of life and death for us," Deb
Roy said.
Stating that protests against the ruling would be
carried to the streets nationally, Roy said that the continuing free
market reforms unlashed a decade ago was to blame for the
"retrograde judgement".
"All this is happening because of the growing
influence of globalisation, privatisation and liberalisation. We
condemn it. We strongly condemn it," he asserted.
The CITU, which is linked to the CPM, said that a
day might well come when all civil rights would be taken away.
"Today, it is state government employees,
tomorrow it will be central government employees, then it will
industrial workers. Then one day all civil rights can be taken away.
All these are authoritarian tendencies. Basic fundamental questions
are involved," he maintained.
Prakash Karat, a CPM leader, echoed the strong
sentiments.
"This is a judgement more in tune with the
liberalisation policies initiated for about a decade. It reflects
that ethos. This will be unacceptable for all democratic forces in
the country," Karat said.
He added that the unprecedented judgement took
away, at one stroke, the right to strike from government employees.
"Not only that, the judgement goes on to make
unwarranted attacks on political parties and on the right to
organise democratic protests and activities. This will gladden those
who do not want any opposition to their control and dominance over
the economic assets of the country," Karat said.
Agreeing with him, CPI's Atul Kumar Anjaan said
that the verdict would have far-reaching consequences on the
country's political, social and economic life, especially trade
union activities.
Said Anjaan: "The Constitution guarantees
collective bargaining. In a democratic country, one of the rights is
the right to strike. We are a democracy, and in a democracy the
right to protest is very much there. We are not living under a
monarchy or military or dictatorial rule. Curbing the right to
strike is like minimising people's rights."
The apex court delivered the controversial
verdict while hearing the Tamil Nadu government employees strike
case.
The two-judge bench said: "Even the trade unions,
who have a guaranteed right for collective bargaining, have no right
to go on strike."
It went on to add: "No political party or
organisation can claim a right to paralyse the economic and
industrial activities of a state or nation or inconvenience
citizens."
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Centre to review efficacy of entry level FDI
norms
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [TUESDAY,
AUGUST 05, 2003]
NEW DELHI: Foreign investors may not have to be
bound by what they had originally committed to the authorities, if
the worrisome FDI norms were subsequently done away with.
The government has decided to take afresh a broad
policy view as to whether entry level conditions would continue to
apply if they had become superfluous later.
What the government would be looking at chiefly
would be foreign investors’ demands for waiver of entry level
conditions in sectors where FDI ceilings have been hiked. The
Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) has been getting a number
of applications asking it to dispense with the conditions that are
not in conformity with the hike in FDI caps and, therefore,
virtually deny foreign investor the benefit of the liberalisation.
Last week, the Board unanimously decided to defer decisions on such
proposals until the policy position is clarified.
The immediate trigger for government’s decision
to review the policy was a proposal of $5.4-bn German clinical
nutrition and fluid therapy major Fresenius to make its Pune-based
Indian subsidiary, Fresenius Kabi, a wholly owned arm. In ’98,
Fresenius was told that it would have to divest 26% of the equity in
favour of local investors. The MNC has now sought a waiver of this
condition, given the fact that 100% FDI is now allowed in the
pharmaceutical sector whereas when the MNC made its original
proposal, the FDI permissible in the sector was 51%.
Fresenius had, in ’98, bought the equity held by
Arvind Mafatlal group. Official sources told ET that the department
of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP), the nodal department for
FDI policy, would now clarify the policy position of the government
on such proposals which had become recurrent of late.
Representatives of the department of economic affairs (DEA) in the
FIPB had argued for unburdening the foreign investors of conditions
that are at variance with existing policy. The investors should not
be approaching the FIPB with such requests in the era of
liberalisation, the DEA had felt.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Committee to study quick transfer of tax
challan from Banks
PTI [SUNDAY, AUGUST 03, 2003] NEW DELHI: Reserve Bank of India has constituted
a High Powered Committee for setting up facilities for online
transmission of tax payment data from banks to the income tax
department.
This is in wake of the recommendations of the
Task Force headed by Vijay Kelkar which had recommended a revised
procedure for collection of taxes and their accounting.
Under the new procedure it is proposed that a tax
payer will be required to fill up only one copy of the challan while
making payment of the tax in the bank.
The present requirement of filling up four copies
of challan for payment of direct taxes is proposed to be given up,
according to finance ministry sources.
Under the new proposal, banks will be networked
to Tax Information Network and will receive payment on line from the
tax payers, the sources said adding it is also recommended that
since the Tax Information Network will digitise all TDS returns, the
requirement to file TDS certificate alongwith the return of income
may also be dispensed with.
It is to implement these suggestions that the RBI
has set up the committee.
The proposed Tax Information Network will contain
information on deduction of taxes at source, payment of direct taxes
made in various banks, information relating to high value financial
transactions and those relating to returns of income, taxes due and
taxes refundable.
The proposed tax information network will have
different components, the sources said, adding it is expected that
the first component relating to digitisation of TDS return will be
completed in the current financial year.
The remaining components are expected to be
operationalised in 2004-05 financial year, the sources said.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
SC strikes down provision of Succession Act
PTI
[ WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2003]
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court while striking down
a provision for Indian Succession Act has observed that a Common
Civil Code would help the cause of national integration.
The judgment was delivered by a three-judge Bench
headed by Chief Justice V N Khare while allowing a petition filed by
one John Valliamatton challenging the constitutional validity of
Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act imposing restriction on a
person to donate by means of a will his property even if he had
loving near relatives.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
Govt plans to roll out Service Tax Act soon
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [FRIDAY, JULY 11,
2003]
NEW DELHI: The government will come out with the
Service Tax Act soon. Without giving a timeline on the proposed Act
Mahendra Prasad, member, Central Board of Excise & Customs (CBEC)
speaking at a CII seminar on service tax said that a comprehensive
legislation will be enacted soon.
Referring to the need for the tax he said that it
has become important in the light of WTO obligations. “The revenue
generated from customs duty will decrease to a great extent and the
revenue generated by the service tax must increase to compensate for
the declining customs duty revenues,” he said. He suggested that all
conceivable services be brought under the service tax net allowing
for credit across all goods and services.
Referring to the recommendations of the Govinda
Rao Committee, Parthasarathy Shome Committee and the Committee of
Finance Secretaries of States, he added that the act will take into
account suggestions made by these committees.
Some of the important recommendations entail
separate service tax legislation, integration of tax on goods and
services, moderate rate of taxation of services, separate
administrative mechanism for administration of service tax laws and
setting up an electronic tax system whereby e-filing of the returns
is possible, risk-based audit of the returns and web connectivity
with the assesses. The CBEC member also broadly recommended a
threshold limit for businesses to be brought under the service tax
net.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
TIMES
NEWS NETWORK [SATURDAY, JULY 19, 2003]
MUMBAI: From now, the income-tax department will
be a factor in proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In a
significant judgement, the DRT, Mumbai, allowed for the first time,
the department’s application for intervention in recovery proceeding
pending before the DRT.
This is a shot in the arm of the tax authorities,
who plan to move the DRT in all pending cases in which tax demands
are involved. The DRT is meant for hearing recovery applications by
banks and FIs and the law is not clear about the right of the I-T
department to intervene in the proceedings for claiming its dues.
The DRT order that allowed intervention by the
I-T department, which was represented by lawyer Ashok Bathija, was
in the case of PNB versus West Coast Brewers & Others. The DRT
ruled, “The anxiety is expressed by the department that unless they
are party to the original proceedings, they do not come to know of
the recovery proceedings. No notices are issued to them as they are
not party to the proceedings. It is likely then that recovery
proceedings may come to an end without the income-tax department
getting knowledge of that. Therefore only for the purpose of
safeguarding the interests of the department, they may be allowed to
intervene.”
[ Source : Economics Times ]
K
G NARENDRANATH
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ FRIDAY, JULY 18,
2003 02:43:17 AM ] NEW DELHI: The government has begun the
groundwork for a third amendment of the Patent Act, throwing open
the possibility of introducing provisions that favour the domestic
constituency, even while fulfilling the country’s obligation to make
the legislation TRIPS-compliant by ’05.
With the process being set in motion, issues on
which the stakeholders are at loggerheads even after the first and
second amendments of ’99 and ’02 are being placed afresh for debate
- grounds for issuance of compulsory licences, “parallel imports”
and “exhaustion of patent rights”, “technology transfer”,
“patentable inventions”, “abuse of patents” and sundry definitions.
The department of industrial policy and promotion
has written to industry organisations like CII, Ficci and Assocham,
as well as NGOs and sector-specific associations asking for their
inputs. “This is the next milestone in India’s IPR law-making. We
propose to have extensive consultation with all stakeholders before
finalising the provisos,” a senior government official said. The
government is planning to hold a series of meeting in major cities
for facilitating the interaction with all stakeholders in the coming
weeks.
The first amendment had extended the facility of
product patents to agro-chemicals and pharmaceuticals. The second
amendment incorporated national emergency, circumstances of extreme
urgency and for public non-commercial use of patented product as
grounds for invoking compulsory licence.
It also explained what would and would not be
patentable. Now, there are demands for review of the grounds for
compulsory licensing, as the second amendment allegedly did not make
full use of the flexibility provided by Doha Declaration on TRIPS
and public health.
Some feel that abuse of patent rights by the
patentee-reckoned on the basis of high price or lack of insufficient
availability-can be a ground for issuing CL and the patentee should
not be required to be convinced of the abuse by the seeker of
compulsory licence.
Also, since the patentee is deemed to have
exhausted his right when there is case for parallel import from a
secondary source, the question of payment of royalty to the patentee
should not arise. Patentee should be mandated to transfer the
technology to the CL holder, on payment of incremental royalty. In
addition to national emergency, a “health emergency” should also be
reason for invoking CL. Health emergency should be distinctly
defined and the power to declare such emergency should vest with the
health ministry.
Declaring a national emergency is a process that
requires legislative and presidential assents, while there should be
broader grounds for invoking CL and under easier practical terms.
There should also be differential appeals for
economic and legal issues. While the proposed appellate tribunal, as
brought in with second amendment, can settle disputes when the
patent controller’s decisions are questioned, an administrative
committee should arbitrate disputes of economic purport. While the
first amendment to the Act in 1999 provided for product patents in
pharmaceuticals and agro-chemicals, there is demand that product
patents be given for food and fine chemicals as well.
Government is taking note of these proposals from
the domestic lobbies, as well as grouse of some multinational
corporations, mainly pharma MNCs, that India’s patent law is weak
and not completely TRIPS-compliant while attempting the third
amendment.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ FRIDAY, JULY 18,
2003 01:48:55 AM ]
MUMBAI: Emboldened by the surge in dollar inflows
and a strengthening rupee, the Reserve Bank of India has raised the
foreign currency limit on remittances for education, employment
abroad, emigration, and maintenance of overseas relatives to
$100,000.
This represents a 20-fold increase in the limit
for employment, emigration and maintenance of relatives. In the case
of education, it represents more than three times the current
ceiling.
Significantly, RBI has also doubled the
remittance limit for medical expenses to $100,000 without insisting
on an estimate by a medical practitioner. Further, corporates will
be allowed to remit up to $1m towards consultancy services procured
abroad against the present limit of $100,000.
In a circular issued here on Thursday, RBI said
that authorised dealers may allow remittances for amounts up to the
above-mentioned limits for each category, without insisting on any
supporting documents, but on the basis of a self-declaration
incorporating the basic details of the transaction and submission of
application in the prescribed format.
“Understandably, this is triggered by large forex
inflows and a robust reserves position. However, this is unlikely to
create a significant demand in dollar...the move is part of RBI’s
policy to liberalise current account transactions, and should not be
construed as a move towards capital account convertibility,” said a
senior banker.
Earlier, authorised dealers were allowed to
release only $5,000 to individuals for meeting expenses towards
overseas employment, overseas education, emigration, and maintenance
of close relatives. The limit for these categories has now been
fixed at $100,000.
In September ’02, RBI eased exchange control
regulations - it allowed forex up to $50,000, or its equivalent, to
be released for medical treatment abroad, without insisting on any
estimate from a hospital/doctor.
“It has since been decided that authorised
dealers may henceforth release foreign exchange up to $100,000 or
its equivalent, to resident Indians for medical treatment abroad,
without insisting on any estimate from a hospital/doctor in
India/abroad,” RBI said.
Until recently, most of the major relaxations in
current account transactions dealt with overseas travel. In
November, RBI allowed Indian travellers going abroad to make hotel
reservations and buy Euro Rail tickets beyond their basic travel
quota, which was earlier doubled to $10,000.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
SHAJI VIKRAMAN
TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ THURSDAY, JULY 17,
2003 01:06:30 AM ] NEW DELHI: The government has dashed the hopes of
Indian companies hoping to raise easy money abroad. A meeting of the
high-level committee on external commercial borrowings (ECBs) on
Tuesday decided to continue for one more quarter with its policy of
not encouraging ECBs of $100m or more.
The decision to put the lid on ECB proposals of
$100m and above was taken after a review of the policy, according to
senior officials.
However, in the first quarter of this year, the
finance ministry which has to vet ECB proposals of a size of $100m
and above declined to approve such proposals.
The growing capital inflows reflected in the
foreign exchange reserves level of over $82bn and the liquidity and
soft interest rate prevailing in the local markets have prompted the
government not to ease the norms, officials said. However, the
Reserve Bank of India will carry out an assessment on the
implications of a potential relaxation of norms and report to the
ministry after a month, officials said. If the norms were to be
relaxed, it would only fuel more inflows, at a time when the
government and the RBI would be keen on seeing more outflows.
The government is aware of the fact that
corporates have a strong case for being allowed to borrow abroad.
The six-month Libor stands at 1.12% and taking
into account the cost of hedging at below 2.5%, the all-in cost of
commercial borrowings would work out to less than 5% for good
corporates. However, in the current scenario, given the impact the
easing on borrowing restrictions have on monetary policy and a
couple of other segments, it has been decided that discouraging ECBs
for the next three to four months would be the logical course to
follow.
Several Indian companies have been keen on
raising ECBs given the falling interest rates abroad. However, they
will have to wait until the next review.
[ Source : Economics Times ]
PTI[ THURSDAY, JULY 17, 2003 09:26:46
PM ]
MUMBAI: Liberalising the current account
transactions, Reserve Bank of India has raised the remittance limits
for employment, emigration and maintenance of close relatives abroad
from $5,000 to $1,00,000.
In case education abroad, the limit has been
enhanced to $1,00,000 from $30,000, RBI said in a notification to
authorised dealers (ADs) on Thursday.
ADs may allow remittances in these instances up
to the new limits without insisting on any sup |